Website:
Call show call info.

I use the years of experience I acquired as a Bad guy Defense Investigator to dissect cops reports and witness statements. Our present caseload consists of cases ranging from simple medicine belongings to assault with a fatal weapon. We aggressively represent our clients. We never permitted the police bully you or your family members. We take only a select number of cases annually so that our customers get personal interest unlike the large box companies. We satisfaction ourselves on being different. We think our expert legal team and our proven technique are just what set us apart. We supply individualized service and compassionate, caring representation just discovered in smaller shop firms. We recognize the significance of a false allegation. We recognize that a D.U.I. or other sort of criminal fee is a life-altering event. We use our ideal efforts to lessen your concern, suffering and pain. Our attorneys have actually an incorporated 40 plus years of criminal defense encounter consisting of 300 plus trials and 11 capital murder cases.

We make use of the very most recent modern technology and use our extensive panel of experts varying from forensics to information technology. While our strategy is specific to the quite unique situations of every situation and customer, our procedure is a proven model, which permits our legal representatives and personnel to strongly stand for criminal protection clients throughout Northern California.

SITUATIONS DISMISSED/ALL CHARGES DROPPED:.

People vs. North-Charges 459(Theft) & 487(A) (Grand Theft).
Individuals vs. Barnes-Charges 417 (Brandishing).
People vs. Hayes-Charges 455 (Attempted Arson).
Folks vs. Landrus-Charges 211/212.5(c) (Attempted Burglary).
Folks vs. Silva-Charges 243e1 (Domestic Brutality).
Individuals vs. Bill-Charges 11550 (Under the Influence).
Folks vs. Lathrop-Charges 245(A)(1) (Assault w/a Deadly Tool).

RECENT COURT RULINGS AT PRELIMINARY HEARINGS:.

We were able to get a fee of 245(a)4 (attack with force most likely to cause excellent physical injury) and 243(e)(1) (spousal battery) dismissed considering that of our aggressive cross exam of the states witness (People vs. Sanchez).

We were able to obtain an attempted break-in charged disregarded after showing to the court that the area lawyer could possibly not show their case. (Individuals vs. Vongvilayphong).

At the preliminary hearing we were able to obtain a felony count of chastening code section 69, resisting apprehension a felony dismissed due to the fact that the prosecution was incapable to show the cost. (Individuals vs. Ross).

We had the ability to obtain 3 counts of felony attack on a policeman and one count of child endangerment a felony disregarded at the preliminary hearing by revealing the folks could possibly not confirm their situation. (Folks vs. Verry).

A matter of 422 of the Penal Code a "Strike" fee disregarded at the initial hearing. (Individuals vs. Jones).

At the initial hearing our cross evaluation of the policeman and disagreement at the close of proof caused Dismissal of the sole felony fee of Possession of Cannabis available. (Individuals vs. Croff).

ARISE FROM OUR CRIMINAL PROTECTION TESTS.

Folks vs. McPherson (Youngster Molestation) Acquittal of all fees.

Folks vs. Mendoza (Murder) Acquittal on charges of murder.

Folks vs. Alejo (Attack w / Deadly Tool) Pardon of felony cost.

Individuals vs. Antione acquittal on the felony costs of (Conspiracy).


The ad is older than 60 days.
Category:  Legals
 |  Address:  Hempstead, New York 11550

Copyright © 2017 Americanlisted.com, All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.